Murphy Calls For Transparency On Syria Train And Equip Program

WASHINGTON – In response to a Los Angeles Times report revealing that various Syrian opposition forces funded or equipped by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) or other U.S. agencies may be fighting each other, U.S. Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), a member of the U.S. Senate State and Foreign Operations Appropriations Subcommittee, and U.S. Senator Brian Schatz (D-Hawai‘i), a member of the U.S. Senate Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, called for more transparency on the Syria train and equip program.
{{more}}
Pending congressional review of an administration request to use additional funds for the Syria train and equip program, Murphy and Schatz sent a letter to U.S. Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter and National Intelligence Director James Clapper requesting more information on how the administration is working to avoid funding activities that undermine U.S. interests in Syria and stop any fighting between U.S.-backed groups.

“We write with concerns about the direction and goals of our Syria train and equip program as the Congress considers a reprogramming to finance the vetted Syrian Opposition Force,” the senators wrote. “We respectfully request additional information about our Syria train and equip program, including how the administration is de-conflicting our support for opposition groups with different interests.”

The full text of the letter is below and is available for download in PDF format here.

Dear Secretary Carter and Director Clapper:

We write with concerns about the direction and goals of our Syria train and equip program as the Congress considers a reprogramming to finance the vetted Syrian Opposition Force. A March 27 report in the Los Angeles Times (“In Syria, militias armed by the Pentagon fight those armed by the CIA”) alleges that various opposition forces backed by either the Department of Defense (DoD) or other agencies may in fact be fighting each other.

We recognize that some of the opposition groups we support may have goals and priorities that are secondary to the national security interests of the United States. Kurdish and Arab groups we support have different objectives and are distrustful of each other. If and when the opportunity to supplant the Assad regime presents itself, these groups could choose to pursue their own interests at the expense of others.

We respectfully request additional information about our Syria train and equip program, including how the administration is de-conflicting our support for opposition groups with different interests. In particular:

· Is the Los Angeles Times report accurate? If so, who are these groups; what are their goals?
· Which U.S. agency or organization is responsible for coordinating our train and equip activities in Syria?
· How is this agency or organization coordinating U.S. activities and ensuring that there is unity of effort among U.S. agencies involved in Syria? Specifically, how is DoD coordinating its activities with other agencies?
· What is our plan to stop fighting between U.S.-supported groups, if that should occur?

We would appreciate a response at a proper level of classification to ensure that we are not appropriating funds for activities that could undermine our interests in Syria.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,

Christopher S. Murphy
United States Senator